Arguing about Asylum: The Complexity of Refugee Debates in - download pdf or read online

By Niklaus Steiner (auth.)

ISBN-10: 0312299427

ISBN-13: 9780312299422

ISBN-10: 1349386030

ISBN-13: 9781349386031

Show description

Read Online or Download Arguing about Asylum: The Complexity of Refugee Debates in Europe PDF

Best europe books

Download e-book for kindle: FACES OF EUROPE SEARCHING FOR LEADERSHIP IN A NEW POLITICAL by D. Pels

The resounding Dutch ‘Nee’ to the eu Constitutional Treaty got here with a novel paradox: the serious debate previous the referendum vote has made we all, sceptics and competitors integrated, a bit extra eu. in view that then, soul-searching in regards to the identification, tradition, political undertaking and actual limits of Europe has constructed right into a everlasting workout.

Download e-book for kindle: Medieval hackers by Kathleen E Kennedy

An open-access monograph interpreting the commonalities among sleek hacker tradition and people who sought to translate safe texts within the center Ages.

Additional info for Arguing about Asylum: The Complexity of Refugee Debates in Europe

Example text

Their cases were still pending or they had been rejected but were allowed to stay provisionally for humanitarian reasons). 15 Public opinion polls show that while a decade earlier 61 percent of the Swiss had seen the presence of foreigners in a positive light, by 1990 that number had dropped to 41 percent. 16 Such negative popular sentiment brought a rash of over 200 attacks on asylum-seekers and foreigners, and in the national election of 1991 the Automobile Party, which had a strong anti-foreigner platform, surprised observers with a relatively strong showing.

Oehen (National Action) added, “Today from a safe vessel and knowing how World War II ended it is wrong to condemn the actions of our fathers and our nation at the time. It is also wrong now to overreact and try to soothe an artificially created guilty conscience ( . . This change in the quantity and origin of asylum-seekers made enough Swiss uncomfortable that Lüchinger (Free Democrat) presented a motion in March 1984 to revise the Asylum Law for a second time; the first revision in 1983 had proven ineffective.

Bretscher (Swiss People’s Party) went a step further to argue that anyone who, like himself, served on the border during the war, and saw “the enormous flood of refugees pouring into our country” understood that the boat was indeed full. Oehen (National Action) added, “Today from a safe vessel and knowing how World War II ended it is wrong to condemn the actions of our fathers and our nation at the time. It is also wrong now to overreact and try to soothe an artificially created guilty conscience ( .

Download PDF sample

Arguing about Asylum: The Complexity of Refugee Debates in Europe by Niklaus Steiner (auth.)


by Brian
4.4

Rated 4.00 of 5 – based on 32 votes